Parsing for Grammar and Style Checking
نویسنده
چکیده
There is a fundamental difference between grammar and style checking: Grammar checking tries to find ill-formedness which by definition is considered to be a mistake and MUST be corrected; style checking has to do with well-formed but somehow marked text. As a result, style checking has to be much more "liberal" as it has to do with "deviations" which might have been intended by the author, but CAN be corrected. This results in two different sets of requirements for a pars~ el'.
منابع مشابه
Grammar and Style Checking for German
As part of the MULTILINT project, a tool for grammar and style checking for Technical Documentation in German has been developed. The tool is based on a at pattern matching approach. This approach has theoretical limits compared to parsing checkers, but still reaches acceptable results on real life corpora. We give some insights into the strategies for rule implementation, focussing on the di e...
متن کاملThe EPISTLE Text-Critiquing System
gent " functions f o r processing business correspondence and other texts in an ofice environment. This paper focuses on the initial objectives of the system: critiquing written material on points of grammar and style. The overall system is described, with some details of the implementation, the user interface, and the three levels of processing, especially the syntactic parsing of sentences wi...
متن کاملVerifying context-sensitive treebanks and heuristic parses in polynomial time
A polyadic dynamic logic is introduced in which a model-theoretic version of nonlocal multicomponent tree-adjoining grammar can be formulated. It is shown to have a low polynomial time model checking procedure. This means that treebanks for nonlocal MCTAG, incl. all weaker extensions of TAG, can be efficiently corrected and queried. Our result is extended to HPSG treebanks (with some qualificat...
متن کاملType-Driven Incremental Semantic Parsing with Polymorphism
Semantic parsing has made significant progress, but most current semantic parsers are extremely slow (CKY-based) and rather primitive in representation. We introduce three new techniques to tackle these problems. First, we design the first linear-time incremental shift-reduce-style semantic parsing algorithm which is more efficient than conventional cubic-time bottom-up semantic parsers. Second...
متن کاملSemiautomatic Interactive Muitilingual Style Analysis (SIMSA)
universal categories like text complexity and readability (Dimarco/Hirst 1988), two approaches to style checking, Writer's Workbench and EPISTLE, should be mentioned. Writer's Workbench (Cherry 1983 et al.) has influenced the development of commercial software such as Rightwriter, PC-Style and Grammatik. It does style critiquing, but it cannot do critiquing that reqmres a parser output, such as...
متن کامل